Conservative Deep State Attempts to Brainwash Local News Viewers

29 posts / 0 new
Last post
anonymous_coward
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 56 min ago
Joined: 10/21/2016 - 12:18pm
Conservative Deep State Attempts to Brainwash Local News Viewers
Economike
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 13 hours ago
Joined: 11/28/2006 - 9:09am
anon -

anon -

By "they" do you mean "the conservative deep state?" In the interest of precision, what, please, is the antecedent of "they?"

Is there a corresponding "liberal deep state?"

Bruce Libby
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 48 min ago
Joined: 01/17/2006 - 7:08pm
Most are smart enough to be

Most are smart enough to be able to fiqure things out.

If there is a "war" it was started by the opposition IMO.
This is a battle in that war,which has been going on for a long time.
As in many wars, there are leaders. In this case the general has issued orders and they are expected to be followed
by his employees. Anyones' sensibilities that are offended can quit their jobs.
Anyone who does not like the message can activate the on /off function.

Watcher
Offline
Last seen: 14 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 03/23/2008 - 12:32pm
This is nothing more than a

This is nothing more than a statement of the owners policy and vision. The left has a fit over something they have made a practice of. There is nothing in the statement by the owners that is political or in error or controversial. In fact it is great in that the stations promise to provide unbiased, fair and not faked news. What urine soaked brain would find that offensive. The diff between an honest media group and the lying, traitors to America...the 5th Column, is that you can record the exact wording from every such stations and news outlets whereby they announce exactly the same lies...word for word.

Al Amoling
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 42 min ago
Joined: 07/07/2004 - 12:01am
This angst about the owner's

This angst about the owner's statement is a big nothing burger.

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
What, precisely, in that

What, precisely, in that statement is causing heartburn? It is a commitment to impartiality and responsiveness to local viewers, nothing more. Is impartiality now seen as a problem???

Jasper
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 4 weeks ago
Joined: 02/06/2014 - 5:24am
It's the irony, dumbass, the

It's the irony, dumbass, the irony. Pot, kettle, black, that sort of thing, you clueless tool. (Cue another 50 comment hand-wringing thread about the drive-by troll who has caused so many to be MIA from AMG). LOL, WTF is wrong with you stupid MFs?

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
IMPARTIALITY being condemned

IMPARTIALITY being condemned by JOURNALISTS (sic) is the IRONY.

From the Society of Professional Journalists webpage (lower right): https://www.spj.org/index.asp

"SPJ's Code of Ethics

Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. Ethical journalism strives to ensure the free exchange of information that is accurate, fair and thorough. An ethical journalist acts with integrity.

The Society declares these four principles as the foundation of ethical journalism and encourages their use in its practice by all people in all media."

And the more detailed Code of Ethics: https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp

Specific GEMS from the above:
"Journalists should:"
"– Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant."
"– Avoid stereotyping. Journalists should examine the ways their values and experiences may shape their reporting."
"– Label advocacy and commentary."
"– Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and avoid political and other outside activities that may compromise integrity or impartiality, or may damage credibility."
"– Explain ethical choices and processes to audiences. Encourage a civil dialogue with the public about journalistic practices, coverage and news content."
"– Respond quickly to questions about accuracy, clarity and fairness."
"– Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations."
"– Abide by the same high standards they expect of others."

Now YOU tell ME what the difference is between this Code of Ethics and Sinclair's statement. The Sinclair statement seems like a paraphrase of exactly the same principles!

Bruce Libby
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 48 min ago
Joined: 01/17/2006 - 7:08pm
Smegma

Smegma
Easy on the self flattery your not the only one . I just used you as an example, good one imo.
At least I recognize you by name ( given to you by another) .
Your posting frequency also prevents you from being a drive-by imo. There is the issue of potential besmirching
of true drive-bys.
The question in your last sentence also contains the answer about causation.

Jasper
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 4 weeks ago
Joined: 02/06/2014 - 5:24am
Being lectured by Sinclair et

Being lectured by Sinclair et. al. about impartiality is like being lectured by Stoolie and his AMG gang about godliness. There is just no credibility.

Economike
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 13 hours ago
Joined: 11/28/2006 - 9:09am
anon -

anon -

If npr had circulated this anodyne statement for its broadcasters to read, would we be worrying about its attempt to play on the gullibility of its audience? Or applauding its heroism?

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
Shut up, Jasper! You think

Shut up, Jasper! You think the vulgarity makes your point? Quite the opposite...

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
The SPJ has an issue with

The SPJ has an issue with Sinclair's stance... but it has more to do with the mandated non-local videos & stories they run.
https://quill.spjnetwork.org/2018/04/03/deadspin-sinclair-broadcast-grou...

Bruce Libby
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 48 min ago
Joined: 01/17/2006 - 7:08pm
We have a gang ?

We have a gang ?

Do we have a name ?

Do we have a gang sign ?

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
You mean like putting

You mean like putting "Democracy Dies In Darkness" on the masthead of a publication trying to do just that?

Kennebec
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 2 days ago
Joined: 12/24/2003 - 1:01am
"What, precisely, in that

"What, precisely, in that statement is causing heartburn? It is a commitment to impartiality and responsiveness to local viewers, nothing more. Is impartiality now seen as a problem???"

Best post of the day ....

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
A Moose Gang? (AMG) With your

A Moose Gang? (AMG) With your hands positioned as antlers on your head?

Bruce Libby
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 48 min ago
Joined: 01/17/2006 - 7:08pm
Who is your ?

Who is your ?

Ugenetoo
Online
Last seen: 8 min 48 sec ago
Joined: 08/05/2011 - 12:32pm
"I'll be your Huckleberry".

"I'll be your Huckleberry".

Bruce Libby
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 48 min ago
Joined: 01/17/2006 - 7:08pm
That's it.

That's it.
The Huckleberry Hipsters !

anonymous_coward
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 56 min ago
Joined: 10/21/2016 - 12:18pm
@Economike: "anon -

@Economike: "anon -

If npr had circulated this anodyne statement for its broadcasters to read, would we be worrying about its attempt to play on the gullibility of its audience? Or applauding its heroism?"

That would be equally as disturbing, especially if it had such a partisan message.
Did they do that?

taxfoe
Online
Last seen: 56 sec ago
Joined: 03/22/2000 - 1:01am
AC would like to know ' . .

AC would like to know ' . . Did they do that?'

Find today's episode of 1A. I didn't hear much of it but they were tearing into Sinclair. The host is too offensive for my taste so no link.

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
The whole premise of a "deep

The whole premise of a "deep state" is that it's hidden. If CIA, NSA, or FBI folks are secretly working against the administration, that's a deep state.

A private company publicly announcing a policy statement isn't anything like that...

Economike
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 13 hours ago
Joined: 11/28/2006 - 9:09am
...it had such a partisan

...it had such a partisan message.

anon -

I guess I missed the partisan part. What was it, would you say?

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
Of course the MSM continues

Of course the MSM continues its efforts to misrepresent...

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/10/donald-trump-sinclair-davi...

The nonsense about Sinclair's political analyst is priceless. The MSM's commentators spout far worse bias with no "commentary" label anywhere in view. This MSM rag appears to insist that non-lefties need a "commentary" tattoo on their foreheads.

Watcher
Offline
Last seen: 14 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 03/23/2008 - 12:32pm
They would prefer a yellow

They would prefer a yellow star sewn to their coats as required by their Aryan heroes or, perhaps, just like their Islamic idols...just toss them off a building...headless.

Matt
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 38 min ago
Joined: 01/21/2008 - 6:21pm
Watcher, you’re projecting

Watcher, you’re projecting again...

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
Now I'm curious... trying to

Now I'm curious... trying to remember if *any* of the mainstream media annotate their commentary... and if so, in what way?

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
Thankfully, the FCC was

Thankfully, the FCC was having none of the MSM nonsense...

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/15/ajit-pai-fcc-chairman-w...

Log in to post comments