You can and should consider all points of the "war ?" question.
But the final point for me is this:
Why interfere when Muslims are fighting Muslims?
Wed, 04/11/2018 - 7:39pm
#1
And now, Syria
We should stay the hell out of Syria, the "rebels" are just as bad as the current regime. WHAT WILL WE GET FOR OUR LIVES AND $ BILLIONS? ZERO
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 16, 2013
Twitler should go back and read some of his old tweets. He almost made sense (before advanced-stage syphilis ravaged his mental faculties).
If we don't take a stand against chemical weapons, then everybody will be using them.
I would prefer that we have other countries assist in this effort but oh wait, they all hate us because Trump is incapable of playing with other kids.
@Thomas Carter: "Twitler should go back and read some of his old tweets. He almost made sense (before advanced-stage syphilis ravaged his mental faculties)"
If you go back and read his old tweets, you'd think he was a Democrat. Increasing the minimum wage, passing DACA, large infrastructure spending budgets that are paid for by borrowing, he's not the least bit conservative.
If we don't take a stand against chemical weapons, then everybody will be using them.
Stick to the old fashion way of just blowing children to bits or shooting them with depleted uranium. We are humanitarians after all.
He was a democrat. And a New York Liberal, as I've said before. The MSM effort to paint him as an alt-right conservative is absurd fake news at its worst.
As I have said in the past, the United States needs a demon in order to justify its spending on offensive armament. In simple terms, the government cannot afford peace as it would throw tens of thousands out of work. That includes those who are supported by the money earned by the military industrial complex.
When all you have is a military everything looks like a war
Unfortunately, Putin also needs a war... propping up an economy failing due to sanctions isn't easy.